ATIGEs 2026

Create & finance your team within a research unit located at Genopole

Translate this page

Timelines

Anticipated dates

  • June 30           Deadline for submission
  • July 10            Eligibility check and evaluation step (1)
  • October 30      Invitation to the Interview step (2)
  • November 30   Grant signature 
Time to grant 5 months from the deadline >>> Start date of the project can be imediatly after signature of the grant.
  • May, 30 2027  Latest term to start the project within the hosting team in Genopole ; this time frame allows the successful applicant to terminate their previous contract or to organise their mobility procedure. There will be no additional time. 
Time to start date of the project : up to 6 months from the signature of the grant

Selection Process

Each application is composed of the applicant CV and the project proposal; both parts are considered as a whole document that will be sent to independent experts for assessment.
 
The assessment will be based on objective criteria scored from 1 to 5 as shown in the tables below and the independent experts will provide recommendation on the funding. The scientific committee of Genopole* will proceed to the ranking and to the final decision based on the expert assessment reports.
 
*The scientific committee of Genopole is composed of scientific leaders from Inserm, CEA, CNRS, Universités Paris-Saclay and Evry-Paris Saclay and from the Centre hospitalier Sud-Francilien.
 

Criteria

 
Evaluation of the research
Research project S&T Quality of the proposal
  • Scientific and technical merit
  • Clarity of objectives
  • Originality of proposed research and awareness of current debates and state-of-the-art
Implementation / Feasibility
  • Comprehensive and appropriate theoretical and methodological framework
  • Feasibility within given time-frame
  • Budget evaluation
Expected Impact of the proposal (expected to the long term)
  • Recognition of anticipated impact of work
  • Publication, dissemination and exploitation plan
  • Openness to interdisciplinary collaboration
  • Openness to international collaboration
Evaluation of the applicant
Applicant qualification Experience and capabilities of the applicant
  • Quality of the CV
  • Research track-record
  • Training
  • Awards & Funding
  • Capacity to conduct the research project
  • Statements of recommendation
  • Previous / current partnerships and international collaborations
 
 

Scoring

Scoring chart
5
 Outstanding  The proposal stands out with exceptional quality and meets all relevant aspects of the criteria
4 Very good  The proposal is strong and meets the criteria well. Any shortcomings are minor
3 Good 
 The proposal addresses the criteria well, although improvements in some elements are called for
2 Satisfactory 
 The proposal broadly addresses the criteria. It has not been fully elaborated and there are several weaknesses
1 Poor  The proposal has serious inherent weaknesses and /or fails to address the criteria
Participate