ATIGEs 2024
Timelines
Anticipated dates
- February Call open
 - March 30 Deadline for submission
 - April-May Evaluation of the proposa
 - June                 Interview of the applicant -> Notification letter
 - July Grant signature with the hosting institution
 - September Latest date to start the project
 
Selection Process
Each application is composed of the applicant profile and the project proposal; both parts are considered as a whole document that will be sent to independent experts for assessment.
The assessment will be based on objective criteria scored from 1 to 5 as shown in the tables below and the independent experts will provide recommendation on the funding. The scientific committee of Genopole* will proceed to the ranking and to the final decision based on the expert assessment reports.
*The scientific committee of Genopole is composed of scientific leaders from Inserm, CEA, CNRS, Universités Paris-Saclay and Evry-Paris Saclay and from the Centre hospitalier Sud-Francilien.
Criteria
| Evaluation of the research | ||
| Research project | S&T Quality | 
  | 
| Feasibility | 
  | 
|
| Impact | 
  | 
|
| Evaluation of the applicant | ||
| Applicant qualification | Experience | 
  | 
Scoring
| Scoring chart | ||
| 
 5 
 | 
Outstanding | The proposal stands out with exceptional quality and meets all relevant aspects of the criteria | 
| 4 | Very good | The proposal is strong and meets the criteria well. Any shortcomings are minor | 
| 3 | Good  | 
The proposal addresses the criteria well, although improvements in some elements are called for | 
| 2 | Satisfactory  | 
The proposal broadly addresses the criteria. It has not been fully elaborated and there are several weaknesses | 
| 1 | Poor | The proposal has serious inherent weaknesses and /or fails to address the criteria |