ATIGEs 2025
Create & finance your team within a research unit located at Genopole
Timelines
Anticipated dates
- March 30 Call openning
- May 30 Deadline for submission
- June-September Eligibility check and evaluation step
- September 30 Notification of the 1st step evaluation ;
- Mid-October Interview step for pre-selected applicants
- November 30 Grant signature
- March, 30 2026 Latest term to start the project within the hosting team in Genopole
Selection Process
Each application is composed of the applicant profile and the project proposal; both parts are considered as a whole document that will be sent to independent experts for assessment.
The assessment will be based on objective criteria scored from 1 to 5 as shown in the tables below and the independent experts will provide recommendation on the funding. The scientific committee of Genopole* will proceed to the ranking and to the final decision based on the expert assessment reports.
*The scientific committee of Genopole is composed of scientific leaders from Inserm, CEA, CNRS, Universités Paris-Saclay and Evry-Paris Saclay and from the Centre hospitalier Sud-Francilien.
Criteria
Evaluation of the research | ||
Research project | S&T Quality |
|
Feasibility |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Evaluation of the applicant | ||
Applicant qualification | Experience |
|
Scoring
Scoring chart | ||
5
|
Outstanding | The proposal stands out with exceptional quality and meets all relevant aspects of the criteria |
4 | Very good | The proposal is strong and meets the criteria well. Any shortcomings are minor |
3 | Good |
The proposal addresses the criteria well, although improvements in some elements are called for |
2 | Satisfactory |
The proposal broadly addresses the criteria. It has not been fully elaborated and there are several weaknesses |
1 | Poor | The proposal has serious inherent weaknesses and /or fails to address the criteria |